Access Commons

Access Commons
Sam Rose's picture

American's turning against stuff?

[...]

More difficult to assess is the question of whether this microbusiness mindset will persist into the childbearing years. From Gary Becker onwards, economists have formulated the decisions about whether to form households, to have children, and how to raise them, in economic terms. Yet it was never clear that people actually made their family decisions that way.

Sam Rose's picture

House to examine plan for United Nations to regulate the Internet | KurzweilAI

China, Russia, Brazil, India are all supporting UN regulation of the internet world wide. Many in the US are reported to be understandably critical of the idea of fixing something that was never broken in the first place.

If this comes to pass, what kinds of routing-around innovation will it spark (if any?). Or, are we destined to sink to the lowest common denominator or internet regulation (China).

Sam Rose's picture

Revolution OS - YouTube

You can watch this movie in it's entirety on youtube. It came out in 2002. I found the claim that the "adoption of curve of linux followed the adoption curve of the internet", and that the application that really made linux was apache web server.

This is really important for the "Access commons" concept. I think it also possibly informs what can be expected in some ways in other "commons" (food, energy, etc).

richardcadler's picture

The technorati have a rather perverse reading of history

url: 

about:blank

I really wish "internet scholars" would give this sort of thing a rest:

-------------------

"Is the Internet due for a “Magna Carta moment?”

That is a question being posed by Rebecca MacKinnon, an Internet scholar at the New America Foundation, who argues that private corporations are exerting excessive power over the Internet and should have that power checked. Just as the English barons crafted the original Magna Carta in 1215 to constrain the power of the unpopular King John, she says, Internet users should organize and push back against the companies.

richardcadler's picture

A 'think and do tank' looking at libraries and e-content delivery

An interview with Michael Porter, who is heading up a group called Library Renewal, “a new kind of nonprofit” organization whose goal is to develop “a new electronic content access and distribution infrastructure.”

----------------

What are the critical implications of mainstream adoption of digital content for libraries?

richardcadler's picture

A privacy economy

A rather bizarre article talking about new companies hoping to capitalize on people's concern over privacy in social media (or the lack of it). Basically, these are companies that are offering to help people own their data--even though it certainly looks like they'll be owning the platform. Here's a sample:

Michael Fertik, Reputation's CEO, says rising concerns about privacy online have created a demand among people to be given control of their data. "We think there is a coming privacy economy," he said.

richardcadler's picture

Afghanistan's FabFi Network

Partly funded by the NSF, FabFi Network is "an open-source system that uses common building materials and off-the-shelf electronics to transmit wireless ethernet signals across distances of up to several miles."

richardcadler's picture

Xerox PARC's plan for the future of the internet

Hmmm, what to think?

Networks used to be about getting messages from point A to point B, Lunt said. Today’s networks, on the other hand, are all about collaboration and sharing, be it with Dropbox or iCloud. Existing network technology wasn’t made for this purpose, and companies have come up with patchwork solutions to make these new kinds of services work.

Syndicate content