academic

richardcadler's picture

Article about open access journal pubishing

Abstract: Open Access (OA) is a model for publishing scholarly peer reviewed journals, made possible by the Internet. The full text of OA journals and articles can be freely read, as the publishing is funded through means other than subscriptions. Empirical research concerning the quantitative development of OA publishing has so far consisted of scattered individual studies providing brief snapshots, using varying methods and data sources. This study adopts a systematic method for studying the development of OA journals from their beginnings in the early 1990s until 2009.

richardcadler's picture

Academic publishers sue George State University

url: 

about:blank

Two articles about a lawsuit launched against Georgia State University by academic publishers, from Copyright Librarian and Duke University:

richardcadler's picture

An academic copyright rebellion

Links to Chronicle of Higher Ed articles about scholars fighting with academic publishers for better access to their own and others' scholarship.

richardcadler's picture

Academic publishers sue over universities' use of e-reserves

"...Cambridge, Oxford, & Sage publishers are filing against Georgia State University and asking the court to issue one of the all-time-detrimental-to-education injunctions in the modern era," in regard to the use of e-reserves for courses.

richardcadler's picture

Hathitrust takes on the orphan works problem

This could turn out to be a very good thing:

"The University of Michigan Library’s Copyright Office is launching the first serious effort to identify orphan works among the in-copyright holdings of the HathiTrust Digital Library, which is funding the project."

richardcadler's picture

The importance of open access science

A strong article on behalf of open-access science which got a mention on BoingBoing. It starts with the story of biologist Jonathan Eisen, who is trying to foster the reputation of his late father's scientific research by posting it online, but is hampered at every step by the existing, closed world of scientific publishing:

richardcadler's picture

The need for a github for science

An argument for creating a github for science that would take advantage of the collaborative strengths that are currently absent from science publishing systems.

richardcadler's picture

Social scientists go social media

Turns out they really are social. And they can be brief enough to tweet, which is the more astonishing thing:

Syndicate content